<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dashes vs. Underscores In SEO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seoly.com/blog/2008/11/20/dashes-vs-underscores-in-seo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seoly.com/blog/2008/11/20/dashes-vs-underscores-in-seo/</link>
	<description>Using experience and data to gain seo insight</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 19:09:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tim Acheson</title>
		<link>http://seoly.com/blog/2008/11/20/dashes-vs-underscores-in-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-220</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Acheson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 16:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slxls.com/blog/2008/11/20/dashes-vs-underscores-in-seo/#comment-220</guid>
		<description>Having devoted considerable time to this question during my career, particularly in recent years, I can only conclude that dashes are not the best delimiter. Moreover, I believe a consensus will emerge eventually with an alternative character being used universally -- probably the underscore</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having devoted considerable time to this question during my career, particularly in recent years, I can only conclude that dashes are not the best delimiter. Moreover, I believe a consensus will emerge eventually with an alternative character being used universally &#8212; probably the underscore</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
